What type of study is this?

This is a DEA study (also classified as: Tobit, Threshold Regression).

September 10, 2025LandOpen Access

Does the “Three Rights Separation” System Improve the Economic Efficiency of Rural Residential Land Use?—Evidence from Yujiang and Deqing, China

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

YZY. ZhangChina University of Geosciences (Beijing)HYHU Yin-genHuazhong Agricultural University MWMin WangSichuan Tourism University

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Analysis reveals a nearly 8.9% improvement in economic efficiency from the three rights separation system, highlighting land transfers and investment incentives.

Key Points

Economic efficiency of rural residential land use improves by approximately 8.9% with the three rights separation system.
Key evidence suggests that investment incentives significantly boost efficiency when idle land exceeds 35 m2.
This analysis employs DEA and threshold regression models to assess the impacts of the three rights separation system.
The findings indicate that enhancing understanding of property rights and regulating the land transfer market are crucial.

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1d97154b1d3bfb60fab1f https://doi.org/10.3390/land14091752

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Analysis reveals a nearly 8.9% improvement in economic efficiency from the three rights separation system, highlighting land transfers and investment incentives.

Does the “Three Rights Separation” System Improve the Economic Efficiency of Rural Residential Land Use?—Evidence from Yujiang and Deqing, China

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Does the “Three Rights Separation” System Improve the Economic Efficiency of Rural Residential Land Use?—Evidence from Yujiang and Deqing, China

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider