Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study demonstrates structural and functional differences in foxtail millet starches, indicating potential in food applications.
This study investigated the physicochemical, structural, and functional characteristics of foxtail millet starches (FMSs), including five non-waxy varieties (N-HXMS, N-LXMS, N-QZHS, N-JG21S, N-BLGS) and one waxy control (W-HJGS). All FMSs exhibited polygonal granules with surface pores and an orthorhombic crystalline structure (A-type X-ray diffraction pattern). Compared with the waxy FMSs, non-waxy starches exhibited higher amylose content (32.4–34.04%), reduced crystallinity (37.01–39.21%) and short-range molecular order, and lower hydration capacity and molecular weight (1.01 × 105–2.81 × 105 g/mol). The non-waxy FMSs also demonstrated enhanced resistance to mechanical shear, better structural stability, stronger recovery behavior, and reduced enzymatic susceptibility. Varieties like N-LXMS, with higher amylose and resistant starch contents (31.17%), are more suitable for functional foods targeting glycemic control, while W-HJGS, with higher swelling power (22.76 g/g) and solubility (92.30%), is well suited as a thickener. This study provides a foundation for future research on the modification of FMSs and their utilization as starch-based matrices in various applications, such as functional food development, biodegradable packaging materials, and targeted delivery systems for bioactive compounds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: