Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 10, 2025HealthcareOpen Access

Assessing the Accuracy and Completeness of AI-Generated Dental Responses: An Evaluation of the Chat-GPT Model

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

AOAhmad A. OthmanASAbdulwadood J. SharqawiAMAhmed A. MohammedAziz

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Assessment of ChatGPT's accuracy and completeness in dental queries across specialties, revealing significant differences between GPT-4 and GPT-3.5.

Key Points

  • GPT-4 achieved higher accuracy and completeness than GPT-3.5 in dental responses.
  • The median accuracy score for GPT-4 was 6.0, significantly greater than GPT-3.5's score of 5.0 (p = 0.02).
  • Descriptive statistics revealed notable improvements in specific dental specialties for GPT-4's responses.
  • Both AI models show potential for dental applications but require expert supervision.

Cite This Study

Othman et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1d97d54b1d3bfb60faff7https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13172144
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Assessing the Accuracy, Completeness, and Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Responses in Dentistry: A Pilot Study Evaluating the ChatGPT Model2024 · 22 citations
  2. 2Evaluating ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0 in Oral Medicine and Radiology: A Comparative Query-Based Cross-sectional Study2025 · 4 citations
  3. 3Exploring the Role of Generative AI in Dental Education and Clinical Decision-Making: Endo-Periodontal Lesions as a Model2025
  4. 4Clinical reliability and consistency of large language models in prosthodontics: an expert evaluation of ChatGPT and Gemini2026
  5. 5Assessing Generative Pretrained Transformers (GPT) in Clinical Decision-Making: Comparative Analysis of GPT-3.5 and GPT-42024 · 58 citations