Retrospective cohort study assesses safety and tolerability of edaravone in ALS patients, suggesting minimal adverse effects.
This retrospective cohort study describes real-world safety and tolerability outcomes in United States-based edaravone-treated patients with ALS. Amerita Specialty Infusion Services provided IV edaravone to patients with ALS treated with their first dose between 25 September 2017-30 September 2022. Mean ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) scores and forced vital capacity (FVC) %-predicted measures were recorded within ± 100 days from care initiation to approximate baseline values. Included patients (n = 243) received/were still receiving IV edaravone/edaravone oral suspension as of 30 September 2022. At initiation, 66.7% were male, mean age ± SD was 61.2 ± 11.2 years, and 61.3% were covered by government insurance. In patients with provider-recorded ALSFRS-R (n = 115) and FVC (n = 84) %-predicted measures within ± 100 days from care initiation, mean ± SD values were 35.1 ± 8.9 and 72.3% ± 21.7%, respectively. Mean ± SD therapy duration was 13.5 ± 11.4 months. Discontinuation reasons included death/hospice (n = 82), patient's choice (n = 38), doctor's choice (n = 31), insurance (n = 18), and other (n = 12). Reasons for IV edaravone discontinuation and IV edaravone administration access device were not associated. Treatment discontinuation was primarily related to ALS disease progression/death, rather than safety or tolerability. This study representative of real-world patients with ALS suggests that edaravone showed consistent safety and tolerability profiles with previous studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abrahão et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: