Literature review highlights rheology and processing in wood-plastic composites, pointing to gaps in modeling.
Wood–plastic composites (WPCs) are polymeric materials, usually thermoplastic, filled with wood flour or fibers. They are relatively durable and stiff and resistant to water. They are also, importantly, relatively cheap compared to materials with similar properties. The WPCs market has grown significantly in recent years, mainly thanks to the increasing construction and automotive markets. Currently, the global WPCs market is forecasted to reach about USD 15 billion by 2030, increasing at an impressive compound annual increase rate of about 12% until 2030. There are some review articles on WPCs written from many different points of view, e.g., the type of materials used (polymers, fillers, auxiliaries), the method of manufacturing and processing, processing properties (thermal and rheological) and functional properties, methods of designing composite products and designing (modeling) forming processes. In this article, we will summarize these different points of view and will present a thorough literature review of rheology and material processing, and more specifically, the modeling of WPCs processing. This work will be presented in relation to state-of-the-art research in the field of modeling the processing of other polymeric materials, i.e., standard (neat) polymers and polymer blends. The WPCs’ processing is significantly different from that of standard plastics due to the differences in thermo-rheological properties, diverse structures, etc. So far, the global WPCs processing models have only been developed for both gravity-fed and starve-fed single-screw extrusion. The models for twin-screw extrusion, both co-rotating and counter-rotating, as well as for injection molding, have still not been developed. WPCs show a yield stress and wall slip when extruding, which must be considered when modeling the process. As the slippage on the screw and barrel grows, the process throughput and pressure diminish, but as the slippage on the die grows, the throughput grows and the pressure diminish. As the yield stress in the screw grows, the process throughput and pressure grow, whereas as the yield stress in the die grows, the throughput diminishes and the pressure grows.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilczyński et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: