The global expansion in reliance on information and communication technologies has thrust the world of cyberspace into the forefront of security studies and strategic discourse. Existing literature has sought to explore the cyber domain as an arena for competition amongst great powers, yet there remains a dearth of literature comprehensively evaluating middle powers in the cyber realm. Cyberspace confronts middle powers with distinct and critical security threats, while simultaneously offering opportunities to assert and expand their position in the global order. Thus, prior thinking surrounding strategic postures for middle powers must be reexamined with consideration given to cyber operations as a tool for statecraft and warfare. Canada, as a digitally advanced and connected middle power committed to upholding the status quo global order, offers a prime case study to explore the question: How can certain middle power states navigate the threat landscape of cyberspace to best protect and promote distinct and shared security interests? Here, I offer the argument for offensive cyber operations (OCOs) as a point of strategic focus, arguing that there is a strong theoretical and practical foundation for Canada to pursue and execute them effectively. I ground this assessment on the principles of ‘middlepowermanship’ and functionalism, discussing the constraints and opportunities afforded by the cyber domain that make a novel tailored approach for middle powers necessary, and why OCOs might best address this need. I closely evaluate the case of Canada, exploring proposed strategic initiatives and mandates alongside available quantitative and qualitative cyber data to evaluate how such developments are manifesting in cyberspace. I conclude that information to date indicates disappointing shortcomings in Canadian offensive cyber activity, but the robust argument for the merit of OCOs alongside promising changes in Canadian cyber organization support the call for continued development, focus and execution of OCOs moving forward.
Julian King (Thu,) studied this question.