Systematic review identifies criteria for potentially inappropriate medications in older adults, suggesting the need for updated validation methods.
Context: Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) refer to the use of a medication whose risks outweigh the potential benefits in older adults, especially when other effective alternatives are available. Aims: To identify and analyze explicit criteria developed for detecting PIMs in older adults, highlighting methodological approaches and pharmacological classifications. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across seven databases from January 1990 to December 2024, following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Criteria developed using expert consensus or evidence-based processes were included. Results: Out of 3,119 articles, 68 met the inclusion criteria. The Beers and STOPP/START tools were most frequently cited. The Delphi method was the predominant approach for validating the selected tools (73.53%). Commonly flagged medications included tricyclic antidepressants, NSAIDs, and benzodiazepines. Conclusions: Numerous validated tools exist, although variations in validation methods and drug classification were observed. A global update and harmonization of explicit criteria are necessary for improved geriatric pharmacotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fernández et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: