This framework enhances security in symmetric key management across cloud providers, suggesting decentralized trust in multiple Key Management Nodes.
This paper addresses the critical security and availability risks inherent in centralized key management systems (KMS) for cloud data protection. The compromise or failure of a single KMS can lead to catastrophic data breaches or loss of access. We propose a decentralized framework to mitigate this single point of failure. Technology or Method: We introduce the Threshold Key Management System (TKMS), a novel framework that leverages threshold cryptography to manage symmetric encryption keys. The framework employs a (k, n)-threshold secret sharing scheme to shard a master symmetric key across n independent Key Management Nodes (KMNs), which are distributed across multiple cloud provider infrastructures. Key generation is performed collaboratively using a Distributed Key Generation (DKG) protocol, eliminating the need for a trusted dealer. Results: The security analysis demonstrates that TKMS guarantees key confidentiality as long as fewer than k KMNs are compromised. The system provides high availability, tolerating the failure of up to n − k nodes. The projected performance evaluation indicates that the cryptographic overhead is manageable and offers a favorable trade-off for the significantly enhanced security and resilience. Conclusions: TKMS presents a robust and fault-tolerant alternative to traditional cloud KMS. By distributing trust across multiple administrative domains, it significantly raises the bar for attackers and protects against provider-level failures. Impact: This work provides a practical blueprint for building highly secure, resilient, and trust-minimized data protection services in the cloud, with direct applications in securing sensitive corporate data, personal information, and critical infrastructure backups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pant et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: