Analysis reveals Asian American women face barriers in elections, indicating party skepticism limits representation.
Inadequate representation of both race and gender in politics remains a prevalent issue that is only further exacerbated by the intersection of these factors. This research attempts to understand precisely where the barriers to achieving this representation lie and focuses on the Asian American community, which saw the lowest levels of descriptive representation across all elected positions in 2020. Are Asian women not running in these elections to begin with? Or is it that their attempts at doing so are frequently met with disappointment? By compiling and analyzing a dataset of 738 Asian American political candidates running in either local, state, or federal elections, a small glimpse of insight was discovered. Women made up 47% of the listed candidates, suggesting that their willingness to become involved in politics was not to blame. This data also revealed patterns in both the primary and general elections. Most notably, Asian women at the federal primaries only secured a spot at the general election 46% of the time but of those candidates that progressed, 83% won their respective race. Arguments have been made that voters do not wish to elect women, and particularly women of colour, into political positions. This line of thinking may dissuade party members from selecting an Asian woman at the primary level, potentially opting for a candidate that they believe is more likely to attract voters at the general election. However, this data suggests that voters are willing to support a female Asian candidate – it is the party who is not. By failing to place confidence in these candidates, the parties themselves are contributing to this lack of descriptive representation. This research presents an opportunity for further investigation into addressing the root causes of this mentality and becoming one step closer to rectifying this gap.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grace Lee (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: