Research shows refined editing windows improve specificity in base editing, suggesting better applications in cystic fibrosis treatment.
Base editing (BE) can permanently correct over half of known human pathogenic genetic variants without requiring a repair template, thus serving as a promising therapeutic tool to treat a broad spectrum of genetic diseases. However, the broad activity windows of current base editors pose a major challenge to their therapeutic application. Here, we show that integrating a naturally occurring oligonucleotide binding module into the deaminase active center of TadA-8e, a highly active deoxyadenosine deaminase, enhances its editing specificity. When conjugated with a Cas9 nickase or alternative PAM Cas9 variants, the engineered TadA variant—TadA-NW1—consistently achieves robust A-to-G editing efficiencies within an editing window consisting of four nucleotides, substantially narrower than the 10-bp editing window of the TadA-8e-derived ABEs. Moreover, compared to ABE8e, ABE-NW1 shows significantly decreased Cas9-dependent and -independent off-target activity while maintaining similar on-target editing efficiency. Further, TadA-NW1 can be reprogrammed to perform desired cytidine deamination and adenine transversion within a restricted editing window. Finally, in a cystic fibrosis (CF) cell model, ABE-NW1 outperforms existing ABEs in accurately and efficiently correcting the CFTR W1282X variant, one of the most common CF-causing mutations. In all, we engineered a suite of base editors with refined activity windows, enabling more precise base editing. Importantly, this study presents a streamlined genome editor re-engineering strategy to accelerate the development of therapeutic base editing. The broad activity windows of current base editors pose a major challenge to their therapeutic application. Here, the authors established a generalizable re-engineering framework to narrow the activity windows of diverse base editors, streamlining the development of therapeutic base editing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valdez et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: