Analysis reveals fraud schemes and corruption risks in road transport in Uzbekistan, suggesting effective anti-corruption measures.
This article systematically analyzes corruption risks and fraud schemes encountered in the implementation of road transport infrastructure projects. The study is based on real cases of crimes committed in the field of road construction and repair in Uzbekistan during 2022-2024. The topic was studied on the basis of scientific and practical methods. Forms of corruption, such as violations of the law in the tender process, the creation of forged documents, the embezzlement of budget funds, and collusion of officials, were considered separately. At the same time, effective anti-corruption measures are indicated based on international experience, including the recommendations of such organizations as the UN Convention against Corruption, GIACC, and Transparency International. The article scientifically highlights the importance of the Integrity Pact, digital tender systems, independent audits, public monitoring, “whistleblower” systems, and “debarment” practices. The author emphasizes the negative impact of corruption on the quality of infrastructure, the level of trust in government bodies, and the rate of economic growth. In order to prevent corruption in infrastructure projects, it scientifically substantiates the need to introduce risk analysis, control, and transparency mechanisms at all stages of their implementation. The research serves as a theoretical and practical basis for developing a systematic approach to combating corruption in the road transport sector of Uzbekistan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Margarita Vadimovna Mirzaeva (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: