Observational analysis compares skull-femoral traction and PVCR methods for treating scoliosis, indicating minimal difference in outcomes.
This study aimed to explore skull-femoral traction and posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR) for the treatment of severe rigid scoliosis with trunk imbalance. The study also aimed to compare the procedure to the non-traction procedure with matched analysis. From January 2007 to December 2021, 59 patients (traction group) with severe rigid scoliosis and trunk imbalance underwent skull-femoral traction and PVCR. For comparison, another 1:1 matched group of 59 patients (non-traction group) was also retrospectively reviewed. These patients were treated with PVCR alone. The spinal function was assessed using the Scoliosis Research Society-Questionnaire. Differences were considered statistically significant at P < .05. The age of the traction and non-traction groups were 21.1 ± 8.2 years and 21.4 ± 10.3 years, respectively ( P > .05). The duration of skull-femoral traction was 24 days (range, 14–39 days). The operative time was 521 ± 101 and 679 ± 443 minutes, respectively ( P < .05). The amount of intraoperative blood loss was 987 ± 446 and 5961 ± 3214 mL, respectively ( P < .05). The number of resected vertebrae was 0.4 ± 0.3 vs 1.1 ± 0.6 ( P < .05). The groups were followed up for 34.9 ± 7.3 months and 31.1 ± 6.6 months, respectively ( P > .05). The total Scoliosis Research Society-22 Questionnaire Scores were 4.7 (range, 3.8–5) and 4.5 (range, 3.3–5), respectively ( P > .05). In the treatment of severe rigid scoliosis with trunk imbalance, preoperative skull-femoral traction improves curve flexibility of the spine, decreasing osteotomy grade, PVCR, average number of 3-column vertebrae resection, operative time, and intraoperative blood loss. However, both traction and non-traction techniques achieve similar spine correction and functional outcomes with similar complications and modalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: