Key result
Optimised heart failure therapy fails to improve self-care ability or well-being in advanced cancer.
Why the study?
Does optimised heart failure therapy improve self-care ability in patients with advanced cancer receiving specialized palliative care?
RCT (n=93)
Double-blind
1:1
Yes
Does optimised heart failure therapy improve self-care ability in patients with advanced cancer receiving specialized palliative care?
Optimised heart failure therapy did not improve self-care ability at 30 days in patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative care, though hypothesis-generating improvements in biomarkers and quality of life were observed in survivors.
Advanced cancer may resemble a heart failure (HF)-like phenotype marked by cardiac wasting, dyspnoea, congestion, and/or physical dysfunction. The trial evaluated safety and efficacy of HF therapy among patients with advanced cancer receiving specialized palliative care to improve patients' self-care ability. Patients with stage 4 solid tumours with a life expectancy of 1-6 months receiving specialized palliative care were enrolled. Patients were required to meet at least two cardiovascular risk criteria and at least one criterion for functional limitation. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive optimised HF therapy (up to 4 drugs: sacubitril/valsartan, empagliflozin, ivabradine, ferric carboxymaltose) or placebo in a double-blind setting. The primary hierarchical endpoint included: (1) days alive and able to wash oneself, (2) ability to walk 4 m, (3) self-reported patient global assessment (PGA) of subjective well-being, during the 30-day placebo-controlled phase. In 5 centers, 93 patients were randomized. The primary endpoint did not differ between groups (win ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-1.58; P=0.83). Overall, mortality was 32% at 30 days (not different between groups). In patients alive at 30 days, HF therapy reduced N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels by 41% (P=0.040), increased left ventricular ejection fraction by 2.9% (P=0.036), and improved PGA scores (odds ratio 0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.75; P=0.016). In a population with advanced cancer receiving specialized palliative care and high early mortality, optimised HF therapy did not improve patients' self-care ability. Among survivors at 30 days, improvements in quality of life measures and cardiac biomarkers suggest potential benefit of individualized HF therapy, which is hypothesis generating and needs validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anker et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Advanced cancer receiving specialized palliative care (n=93). Optimised HF therapy (sacubitril/valsartan, empagliflozin, ivabradine, ferric carboxymaltose) vs. Placebo was evaluated on Hierarchical endpoint including: (1) days alive and able to wash oneself, (2) ability to walk 4 m, (3) self-reported patient global assessment (PGA) of subjective well-being (win ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.57-1.58, p=0.83). Optimised heart failure therapy did not improve self-care ability or well-being compared to placebo in patients with advanced cancer (win ratio 0.95; 95% CI 0.57-1.58; P=0.83).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: