Reflection on tenure systems highlights the need to include DNPs in academia, suggesting reforms to balance teaching, practice, and research.
The traditional tenure and promotion systems in nursing academia have long prioritized research achievements, reflecting a PhD-centric framework. This often overlooks the vital contributions of Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) professionals, whose work centers on translating evidence-based knowledge into clinical practice. Drawing on personal experiences as a board-certified DNP in family practice and an assistant professor, this piece highlights the existing imbalance between teaching, practice, and research in academia. It advocates for the inclusion of DNPs within tenure structures to better harmonize the diverse but complementary contributions of all nursing professionals, including DNPs, and PhDs. The article further emphasizes the need for systemic reforms that align doctoral education with comprehensive university career planning. These reforms should incentivize scope-based practice, ensuring that all nurses work according to their competencies, while fostering economic viability and career growth. By integrating these changes, academia can create a more inclusive and collaborative environment that values the unique roles of DNPs, ultimately enhancing the quality and innovation in nursing education and practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ann-marie Steele (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: