Conceptual analysis highlights the role of low-cost signals in social conflict, suggesting a new dimension in signal theory.
Signal theory has long emphasized cost as the guarantor of honesty. Zahavi’sHandicap Principle [ref] proposed that costly traits (e.g., peacock tails, lion roars)are reliable precisely because they are expensive. Later research acknowledgeddeceptive signals, where organisms bluff by mimicking costly traits (e.g., Batesianmimicry) [ref].Yet an important dimension remains underdeveloped: the systematic treatment oflow-cost, weaponized signals in human and social conflict.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
jim P.Ling (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: