Analysis of evaluation criteria and geopolitical challenges in defense policy, highlighting strategic alignment.
This article examines the process of formulating defense policy by analyzing the key considerations and evaluation criteria that underpin effective decision-making. Drawing on historical developments from the post-Cold War era to current geopolitical challenges, the study emphasizes the importance of balancing strategic ends with available means within a resource-constrained and uncertain planning environment. It outlines the key elements in defense policymaking—defining objectives, strategy, and capabilities—and highlights how risk assessment plays a central role in aligning force structure with national security goals and resource allocation. Through qualitative analysis and illustrative figures, the study offers practical recommendations for policymakers, emphasizing the need for a systematic, adaptable, and transparent policymaking process. Ultimately, the article argues that a rational and disciplined approach to defining both ends and means, combined with creative exploration, is essential for preparing for the uncertainty of today’s security environment. A follow-up study will focus on the processes, stakeholders, and cultural factors in shaping defense policy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Тодор Тагарев (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: