Observational analysis examined color differences in implant-supported lithium disilicate crowns, indicating the benefits of gold-shaded titanium abutments.
To evaluate the influence of titanium and gold-shaded titanium as well as peri-implant soft tissue thickness on the optical outcome of implant-supported lithium disilicate single crowns. Eighteen patients received an anterosuperior implant (Astra Tech Implant System EV). Two customized titanium abutments (gold and conventional) were fabricated, and a lithium disilicate crown was placed. Color measurements were taken at the free gingival margin and in the mid buccal region of both the crown and the contralateral tooth using a spectrophotometer for both abutments. The CIE Lab* color scale was used, and values were calculated as ∆E. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed ranks test (α = 0.05). The type of abutment did not significantly influence ∆E values at either the peri-implant soft tissue (p = 0.711) or coronal level (p = 0.094). Lower ∆E values were observed with gold-shaded titanium abutments at both soft-tissue (11.77 ± 6.9) and coronal level (10.42 ± 7.8) compared to titanium abutments (12.85 ± 4.5 and 10.53 ± 7.1, respectively). The mean peri-implant soft tissue thickness was 2.91 ± 0.89 mm. Both titanium and gold-shaded titanium abutments resulted in perceptible color differences at soft tissue and coronal levels. Gold-shaded abutments yielded the lowest ∆E values. Peri-implant soft tissue thickness did not significantly affect the ∆E at the gingival level. Gold-shaded titanium abutments demonstrated a tendency toward improved esthetic outcomes compared to conventional titanium abutments, suggesting their potential usefulness in anterior implant restorations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martínez‐Rus et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: