The Politics of Restrictive Immigration Policies: A Case Study of V4 Countries Amid Migration Crisis (2014–2019)

This study examines the political determinants of restrictive immigration policies in the Visegrad Group (V4) countries—Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia—between 2014 and 2019, focusing on ideological positions, parliamentary power, nationalism, economic concerns, and security considerations of political parties. Following the 2015 migration crisis, the V4 nations adopted a notably restrictive stance on immigration, diverging from Western European policies. While existing research highlights nationalism and populism, limited empirical analysis systematically assesses political party dynamics influencing immigration policy. To address this gap, this study employs a quantitative research design, utilizing descriptive and econometric analysis of the Chapel Hill Expert Survey (CHES) data. Findings indicate that right-wing and nationalist parties, particularly those with strong parliamentary representation, are key drivers of restrictive policies. Additionally, economic concerns and security narratives further reinforce anti-immigration stances. The study contributes to broader discussions on EU governance, emphasizing the role of domestic politics in shaping migration policy. The results demonstrate the importance of more balanced, inclusive immigration strategies that reconcile security, economic stability, and social cohesion. Policy recommendations suggest that the EU should focus on addressing political and ideological factors, promote dialogue and cooperation between V4 and Western EU states, and enhance public education to counter nationalist rhetoric and shape more balanced immigration policies.