This note explores different distinctions in truth at and in possible worlds, highlighting their implications for modal metaphysics.
The distinction between truth in and truth at a possible world plays a significant role in many debates in modal metaphysics. In this note, I argue that there are two radically different ways of making the distinction precise. Moreover, I argue that the differences matter, showing how they differently constrain the modal metaphysics of properties and propositions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christopher James Masterman (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: