Cross-sectional study finds high rates of alarm fatigue among healthcare workers, indicating a need for better alarm management.
Introduction: Alarm fatigue, characterized by desensitization to alarms, is a prevalent issue among healthcare workers (HCWs), particularly those in intensive care units (ICUs). The constant exposure to device-related alarms both genuine and false can significantly impact human health and behavior. In this study, the consequences of alarm fatigue delve into and its effects on HCWs. Methods: This descriptive analytic study was conducted in different ICUs of Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal from 1 February, 2024 to 1 March, 2024. Data was collected by using standard Charité Alarm Fatigue Questionnaire (CAFQ) Likert scale based response was collected from all the participants and the data were analyzed. Results: Total 87 HCWs working in ICU had participated in this study. 57 (65.5%) participants were working in ICUs for more than one year. 76 % participants were working for 12 hours per day. 55 (63%) knew about alarm fatigue, three (3.4%) had never heard about alarm fatigue and remaining 20 (33%) had minimum prior knowledge. In this study, it was found that 29 (33.7%) ICU working staffs were having alarm fatigue with, score range (18 - 27). In 50%, alarm made them confused, triggered physical symptoms in 36 (41%), reduced concentration in 34 (39%), and interruption workflow in 27 (31%) of HCWs. Conclusions: Alarm in ICUs poses a significant fatiguein HCWs (33.7%). Balancing patient safety with minimizing alarm burden requires a multifaceted approach. By addressing alarm management systematically, the consequences of alarm fatigue can mitigate and enhance patient care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pant et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: