Review analyzes methods for compiling comparable corpora, highlighting applications in bilingual and multilingual lexicography.
Comparable corpora and their application in research have been an object of interest since the 1990s. Following the establishment of the annual workshop series “Building and Using Comparable Corpora” (BUCC) in 2008, there has been an increasing interest in comparable corpora and the study of their effectiveness for bilingual/multilingual projects. Although there is a general comparable corpus of the Georgian language compiled as part of the “Aranea” project, a family of web-crawled comparable corpora, currently, there are no specialized comparable corpora available for the Georgian language. In general, the application of comparable corpora for bilingual/multilingual specialized lexicography in Georgia is a novel research topic that has not been explored before. Therefore, this review paper aims to analyze the concept and types of comparable corpora. It also discusses the advantages of using comparable corpora and the areas of their application. Furthermore, the paper focuses on the methods of compiling specialized comparable corpora, in particular, such issues as representativeness, balance, corpus size, and comparability criteria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ketevan Mchedlishvili (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: