Essay discusses culturally responsive evaluation practices for Native Hawaiian voices and their implications for higher education.
The objective and intention of this moʻolelo (essay, article, or story) is to situate Native Hawaiian voices within an evaluation context and to present emergent ideas toward culturally responsive and responsible evaluation and assessment in Hawaiʻi. This story honors a genealogy of dissertation work that focused on Native Hawaiian doctoral students’ understandings of well-being and extends this work by exploring reflexive lessons for improving assessment in higher education. In this effort, Hawaiian theoretical principles are presented to structure the emergent ideas that are articulated in this essay. From these principles, assessment, and evaluation implications are discussed. The original work served as a guide for defining cultural responsiveness and responsibility for institutional measurement in this article.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawehionālani K. Goto (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: