Commentary supports mandatory CC-BY licensing for research results, suggesting flexibility in licensing types.
While I do not agree in details on the statement made by Klaus, I agree with his intentions, and happy to propagate the mantra, like others did before me: The details I disagree with: no need for shouting; we can all perfectly well read it in lower case CC-BY is not required; any open data license will do Now, I know some of you disagree, and I understand the costs for maintaining and curating a database.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Egon Willighagen (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: