⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

September 6, 2015Open Access

A final example to show that misquotation is nothing to do with open licensing

Martin Paul Eve

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

Misquotation is shown to occur regardless of a work's license status.
Legal redress remains available under a CC BY license, ensuring protection.
Importance of understanding the effects of open licensing on the accuracy of information.
Creative Commons licenses do not influence the truthfulness of statements made about works.

Implication

Analysis shows that misquotation is independent of open licensing, highlighting Creative Commons implications.

Abstract

No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Martin Paul Eve (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dc27558a7d58c25ebb3a02 https://doi.org/10.59348/1xz07-va638

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Researchers are altering their methods because of uncertainty over Creative Commons licenses2015
2Is academic work commercial? How does this affect libre licensing?2011
3An update on the reprint of my book2021
4On informed consent and open licensing2021
5Creative Commons licenses and the non-commercial condition: Implications for the re-use of biodiversity informationOriginal Research · 2011 · 82 citations

More related papers

A little more on defamation and CC BY2019
Copyright and creative commons licenses in scholarly publishing: A practical guide for researchers2025
"Make all research results CC-BY"2008