Exploratory analysis shows high prevalence of work-related injuries in physiotherapists, indicating significant psychological demands and awkward positions may heighten risks.
The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of and risk factors for work-related injuries among physiotherapists in Libya. A self-administered questionnaire was sent to 80 physiotherapists in Toubrok city, and neighboring area. Unconditional logistic regression was used to study the association between job exposures and the risk for work-related injuries. The questionnaire was returned by 58 physiotherapists. Of 58 subjects who answered specific questions about work-related injuries, 52 (53.5%) were affected by work-related injuries in at least one body part. Regions most affected were the lower back, the neck, elbows, and knees. For neck pain, associations were found with: manual therapy techniques (adjusted odds ratio [OR]53.90;95% confidence interval [CI]51.2–13.1); working in awkward or cramped positions (OR54.96; 95% CI51.3–18.7); and high psychological job demands (OR54.34; 95% CI51.2– 15.0). For lower back pain, associations were found with working in awkward or cramped positions (adjusted OR56.37; 95% CI51.6–24.7); and kneeling or squatting (adjusted OR54.76; 95% CI51.4–15.9). The majority of the respondents reported work-related injuries. General physical and psychosocial work-related exposures, as well as specific therapy tasks, were strongly associated with work-related injuries. The increased prevalence of symptoms among younger physical therapists in particular underlines the need for them to have at their disposal a range of strategies to reduce risks posed by their work and avoid injury. Most importantly, there is a need for further research to identify aspects of physical therapy practice that place therapists at greatest risk and to develop methods of reducing that risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masoud et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: