Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pilot study shows brief family-based treatment improves parental self-efficacy in caregivers of adolescents with eating disorders, indicating high acceptability.
Family-based treatment (FBT) is the recommended approach for adolescents with eating disorders (EDs), but long waitlists hinder its delivery. This study aimed to explore the feasibility and acceptability of a brief 5-week outpatient FBT psychoeducation group for parents/caregivers of adolescents with anorexia nervosa (AN). The secondary aim of this study was to examine its preliminary effectiveness of increasing parental self-efficacy and decreasing expressed emotion and accommodation of the eating disorder. Eighteen parents/caregivers of adolescents (n = 9; aged 9-18) with AN were recruited. Parental accommodation, parental self-efficacy, and expressed emotion were assessed at baseline, end of treatment (week 5), and 1-month follow-up (week 9). Qualitative interviews were collected weekly. Quantitative results were analysed using linear mixed modelling, while qualitative interviews underwent reflexive thematic analysis. Numerical evaluation of feasibility/acceptability included rates of enrollment, retention, and attendance. Parental self-efficacy significantly improved during treatment, with gains sustained at 1-month follow-up (p < .001). Parental accommodation also significantly decreased across treatment (p < .001) but significantly resurfaced at 1-month follow-up (p = .001). Qualitative results demonstrated high acceptability of the group; participants found this intervention to be helpful and better equipped them to address their child's ED after group completion. Feasibility/acceptability metrics showed moderate enrollment (75%), high retention (94.4%), and attendance (97%). A modified 5-week FBT group for parents/caregivers of adolescents with AN shows preliminary feasibility and acceptability, informing future FBT treatment planning and service provision for ED providers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: