Retrospective analysis assesses fine-needle aspiration’s accuracy in classic Hodgkin lymphoma, suggesting it may improve diagnosis.
To analyze the cytologic characteristics fine-needle aspiration using histology as the gold standard and to evaluate its diagnostic application in classic Hodgkin lymphoma. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 17 patients who underwent both coarse-needle aspiration and fine-needle aspiration and were histologically confirmed with classic Hodgkin lymphoma(CHL) at our hospital from December 2012 to December 2023. Clinical information of these patients was collected, and the smear morphology, immunocytochemistry and corresponding biopsies were reviewed. Among the 17 cases of CHL, there were 5 cases of mixed cellularity, 10 cases of nodular sclerosis and 2 cases were unsubtyped. Fifteen cases were correctly diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration, with an accuracy rate of 88.2%. The other two cases were misdiagnosed as non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Morphologically single dispersed mononuclear Hodgkin cells and multinucleated Reed-Sternberg cells were observed in a heterogenous background of lymphocytes in cytology smears, and these cells were positive for CD30 immunocytochemistry. Fine needle aspiration is less invasive and quicker, and the cell morphology is better preserved as compared to histological biopsy. It is easier to recognize pathognomonic Hodgkin or Reed-Sternberg cells and it is helpful for the rapid diagnosis and clinical management of CHL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: