Systematic investigation highlights the role of Cu in enhancing mechanical and magnetic properties of silicon steel.
The effects of Cu content on the microstructure, texture, precipitates, and magnetic and mechanical properties of 0.20 mm-thick non-oriented silicon steel (3.0% Si-0.8% Al-0.5% Mn) were systematically investigated using optical microscopy, X-ray diffraction, electron backscatter diffraction, and transmission electron microscopy. The strengthening mechanisms of Cu-bearing high-strength non-oriented silicon steel were further elucidated. Increasing Cu content inhibited grain growth and suppressed the development of the α*-fiber texture in annealed sheets, while promoting the formation of γ-fiber texture. As a result, the P1.0/400 and B50 values deteriorated. The P1.0/400 and B50 values of 1.47% Cu non-oriented silicon steel were 13.930 W/kg and 1.614 T, respectively. However, due to the solid solution strengthening effect of 0.5% Cu and partial precipitation strengthening, the Rp0.2 increased by 43 MPa. After aging treatment at 550 °C for 20 min, the P1.0/400 values of the aged sheets slightly increased, while the B50 values remained almost unchanged. In the aged sheets containing 1.0–1.5% Cu, clustered Cu-rich precipitates with average sizes of 2.71 nm and 13.28 nm were observed. The crystal structure of these precipitates transitioned from the metastable B2-Cu to the stable FCC-Cu. These precipitates enhanced the Rp0.2 of the non-oriented electrical steel to 241 MPa and 269 MPa through cutting and bypass mechanisms, respectively. A high-strength non-oriented silicon steel with balanced magnetic and mechanical properties was developed for driving motors of new energy vehicles by utilizing nanoscale Cu-rich precipitates formed through aging treatment. The optimized steel exhibits a yield strength of 708 MPa, a magnetic induction B50 of 1.639 T, and high-frequency iron loss P1.0/400 of 14.77 W/kg.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: