Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experiments demonstrate comparable performance of on-hand pads and air pads in augmented reality, suggesting improved hand tracking may allow new interaction methods.
Interaction in Augmented Reality primarily relies on raycast pointing and mid-air touch. An alternative consists of using the non-dominant hand as a touch-sensitive surface, enabling more comfortable, less fatiguing input. AR UI design guidelines have so far discouraged this alternative because of poor hand tracking performance when the hands overlap, favoring touchpads in the air near the hand, rather than on the hand. But significant improvements to the hand tracking capabilities of recent commodity headsets suggest that on-hand pads may now be feasible. We develop an on-hand touchpad prototype and conduct two studies that involve both discrete input and continuous control tasks. The first study compares such on-hand pads to baseline in-air and on-object pads, showing comparable performance despite some limitations in tracking accuracy. The second study quantifies the advantage of on-hand and in-air pads over on-object pads during transitions between touchpad input and other physical hand activities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dupré et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: