Retrospective study reveals low adoption of intermittent auscultation in low-risk pregnancies, suggesting gaps in implementation of guidelines.
Subpartum fetal monitoring is a debated topic in obstetrics. Studies have shown that CTG monitoring can lead to not always necessary interventions such as C-sections and vaginal-operative deliveries. Therefore, the 2021 AWMF S3 guideline "Vaginal Birth at Term" recommends structured intermittent auscultation instead of CTG monitoring in low-risk pregnancies for the first time.In a retrospective cross-sectional study, all German maternity clinics (n=616) were asked using an online questionnaire whether they use intermittent auscultation for low-risk pregnancies as well as reasons for and against it. The response rate was 16% (n=96). RESULTS: 22% (n=21) of clinics reported using intermittent auscultation always or sometimes. A significant correlation was found if changes had occurred and the application of intermittent auscultation (X2=12.95, df=2, p=0.001). Other factors such as the availability of one-to-one care (>95%), midwife-led delivery rooms, and differentiation between high- and low-risk pregnancies had no significant influence on the use of intermittent auscultation.The guideline has not led to the use of intermittent auscultation for monitoring in low-risk pregnancies. Clear low-risk definition, one-to-one care, qualified staff and updated studies on intermittent auscultation vs. CTG are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adams et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: