Retrospective cohort study shows 37.7% of patients with atopic dermatitis develop Dupilumab-associated ocular surface disease, indicating a need for awareness.
New biologic treatments are increasingly used for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD). This study examined clinical characteristics of patients with Dupilumab-associated ocular surface disease (DAOSD). 382 patients were included in a retrospective nationwide cohort study of all Danish adults treated with Dupilumab for AD for more than 16 weeks. The frequency of DAOSD was 37.7% with a median follow-up of 1.6 years. Before initiating treatment, 61.3% of the DOASD-patients already had pre-existing ocular sur-face disease (OSD), why the DAOSD-group was then sub divided in two groups: one with pre-existing OSD and one without pre-existing OSD. Patients who developed DAOSD had a longer median duration of AD (41.5 and 44 for patients with pre-existing OSD and patients without pre-existing OSD) vs. 33 years (non-DAOSD), p=0.005), a higher median reduction in EASI score (93.3% and 90.2% vs. 83.8%, p=0.006) and more frequently rhinitis (49.4% and 52.7% vs. 37.1%, p=0.031). In 75% of cases, DAOSD presented before week nine, conjunctivitis was the most common sign of DAOSD (73.2%) and to treat DAOSD, ophthalmolo-gists prescribed lubricating eye drops to patients with pre-existing OSD and patients without pre-existing OSD drops in 88.5% and 87.3 of the cases, and mild (e.g., hydrocortisone) and strong (e.g., dexamethasone) cortico-steroid eye drops equally frequent (24.1 and 25.3% vs. 16.4% and 29.1%). In 5% of the cohort, Dupilumab treatment was discontinued due to DAOSD (n=19), even though these patients received lubricating eyedrops (84%), mild steroids (41.1) and strong steroids (31.6%). DAOSD should be recognized by dermatologists and should lead to consideration of early referral to ophthalmologists.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nøhr et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: