Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Research shows sound influences ethos and logos in argumentation, suggesting its importance in multimodal contexts.
Recent research in argumentation and rhetoric has increasingly recognized the importance of sound—not merely as a component of delivery (an appeal to the ear, as described in Rhetorica ad Herennium), nor solely as a contributor to ethos or pathos, but also as an element of invention and a contributor to logos. Although Eckstein’s book is not explicitly devoted to argumentation theory, it undoubtedly makes a valuable and much-needed contribution to the growing field of multimodal argumentation. As Eckstein (p. 131) states: “This book is about what happens when sound, as a noun, becomes understood as a process, when sound is disseminated through the public screen soundly (adjective).”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gabrijela Kišiček (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: