Pilot study shows effective nasal anaesthesia and rapid airway passage in healthy adults, suggesting better comfort and safety.
Background: Topical anaesthesia of the nasal mucosa is essential for comfortable and effective nasal instrumentation. However, current methods often result in uneven anaesthesia, which can cause discomfort. This study evaluates the clinical performance of a newly developed soft mist nasal atomiser (NAA: Nasal Atomiser Adapter) for nasal topical anaesthesia. Methods: Twenty healthy adult volunteers received 1 mL of 4% lidocaine via the NAA in two doses of 0.5 mL each, administered into one nostril. Five minutes after administration, a size 7 nasopharyngeal airway was inserted into the anaesthetised nostril to assess tolerance. Comfort and anaesthetic effectiveness were rated by both participants and the attending anaesthesiologist using numeric rating scales (1–10). Results: The median total spraying time was 177.5 s (range, 152–192 s), which included the 120 s waiting period between the two 0.5 mL doses. Insertion of the nasopharyngeal airway took a median of 8.0 s (range 2–25 s). Participants rated the comfort of nasal lidocaine administration at a median of 9/10, and anaesthesia levels were rated as good to very good by both participants and clinicians. In 85% of cases, no reaction was observed during insertion of the nasopharyngeal airway; minimal reactions occurred in the remaining 15%. No adverse events were reported. Conclusions: The NAA provided effective, reliable, and safe anaesthesia of the nasal cavity, with a high level of comfort for the subject. It enabled fast and comfortable nasal instrumentation. These findings support the NAA as a promising alternative to conventional nasal anaesthetic techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Markerink et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: