Comparative analysis of CNN and LSTM models for gait detection in a 69-subject dataset, suggesting accuracy improves detection.
Changes in gait are associated with an increased risk of falling and may indicate the presence of movement disorders related to neurological diseases or age-related weakness. Continuous monitoring based on inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor data can effectively estimate gait parameters that reflect changes in gait dynamics. Monitoring using a waist-level IMU sensor is particularly useful for assessing such data, as it can be conveniently worn as a sensor-integrated belt or through a smartphone application. Our work investigates the efficacy of estimating gait events and gait parameters based on data collected from a waist-worn IMU sensor. Results are compared to measurements obtained using a GAITRite{} system as reference. We evaluate two machine learning (ML) based methods. Both ML methods are structured as sequence-to-sequence models (Seq2Seq). The efficacy of both approaches in accurately determining gait events and parameters is assessed using a dataset consisting of 17,643 recorded steps from 69 subjects, who performed a total of 3,588 walks, each covering approximately 4 meters. Results indicate that the CNN-based algorithm outperforms the LSTM method, achieving a detection accuracy of 98.94% for heel strikes and 98.65% for toe offs, with a mean error of 0.09 ± 4.69 cm in estimating step lengths.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stenger et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: