Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 12, 2025International Journal of Public Sector Management

A decentred study of uncollaborative governance

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ACAmanda CromptonJWJustin WaringLoughborough University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Qualitative analysis reveals challenges in collaborative governance, indicating conflicts among public leaders.

Key Points

  • Decision-making often reflects uncollaborative dynamics, highlighting the limitations of collaborative ideals in practice.
  • Three forms of uncollaborative governance were identified: auditable, authoritative, and adversarial uncollaboration.
  • Case studies from the English healthcare system illustrate how competing interests complicate collaborative efforts.
  • This analysis provides insight into the impact of strategic behavior and institutional logics on public governance.

Cite This Study

Crompton et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d44a3731b076d99fa53583https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpsm-03-2025-0117
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Collaboration in action: How micro-level relational dynamics are connected with issue frame convergence in collaborative governance networks2024 · 9 citations
  2. 2The Design and Implementation of Cross‐Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature2006 · 2,396 citations
  3. 3Trust in Complex Decision-Making Networks2007 · 351 citations
  4. 4Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?2026 · 1,292 citations
  5. 5Democratic Theory and Political Science: A Pragmatic Method of Constructive Engagement2007 · 174 citations