Cross-sectional study reveals impaired pulmonary function in survivors of high-risk childhood leukaemia, suggesting need for tailored monitoring.
Background Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) survival rates have improved, reaching 95%. However, 25–50% of survivors experience significant treatment-related toxicities. This study investigated late pulmonary adverse effects, including pulmonary symptoms and pulmonary function, in childhood ALL survivors compared to controls. Methods This Danish national cross-sectional study (February 2019 - May 2024) recruited ALL survivors (N=295 eligible) and matched controls 1:1 for pulmonary symptoms questionnaire and pulmonary function tests (PFTs): Nitrogen multiple breath washout (N 2 MBW), spirometry, impulse oscillometry (IOS), broncho dilator response (BDR), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and nitric oxide (DLNO). Results Among 192 survivors and 213 controls performing PFT, 185 survivors and 209 controls had valid PFTs included in analyses. Prevalences of resting and exertional dyspnoea in survivors (2%, 14%) versus controls (0%, 3%) were highest among survivors treated with high-risk chemotherapy (HR) (6%, 18%) and stem cell transplantation (HR-SCT) (5%, 26). Compared to controls, HR and HR-SCT survivors had impaired mean z-scores for forced expiratory volume in the first second (−1.64 and −0.37 versus 0.28), forced vital capacity (−1.66 and −0.67 versus 0.20), DLNO (−2.39 and −2.55 versus 0.97) and HR-SCT survivors: lung clearance index (3.31 versus 0.52) and DLCO (−1.23 versus 0.12). Conclusions We found a higher reported prevalence of exertional dyspnoea and impaired pulmonary function in HR and HR-SCT survivors compared to controls. Reassuringly, non-HR(-SCT) survivors demonstrated pulmonary function comparable to peers. The findings highlight the need for timely detection and tailored monitoring of PFD to improve pulmonary health in HR and HR-SCT survivors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meyer et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: