This analysis reveals that board gender diversity reduces leverage ratios in firms, suggesting enhanced governance benefits in emerging markets.
Board gender diversity (BGD) has gained attention as a governance mechanism that may influence corporate financial decisions. However, empirical evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) remains limited despite the region’s significant gender disparities in corporate leadership and distinct institutional characteristics. This study examines how BGD affects capital structure decisions in LAC firms, drawing on agency theory and resource dependency theory. We analyze a panel dataset of 403 firms from 2015 to 2022, sourced from the London Stock Exchange Group database, using fixed effects models with Driscoll–Kraay standard errors to control for firm heterogeneity and econometric concerns. Results show that BGD is significantly and negatively associated with leverage ratios, with a one percentage point increase in female board representation corresponding to a 0.15 to 0.25 percentage point decrease in debt-to-capital ratios. This relationship is robust across multiple specifications and exhibits threshold effects, with stronger impacts when female representation reaches 20% or higher. The negative association is more pronounced for larger firms, consistent with enhanced governance benefits in complex organizations. Our findings suggest that gender-diverse boards exercise more effective oversight of financial decisions, leading to more conservative capital structures in emerging markets where governance mechanisms are particularly important for firm credibility and stakeholder confidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
González-Ruíz et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: