Comparison framework evaluates hypergraph kernels' expressiveness, highlighting non-isomorphic challenges.
Designing expressive hypergraph kernels that can effectively capture high-order structural information is a fundamental challenge in hypergraph learning. In this paper, we propose a novel comparison framework based on hypergraph homomorphisms to evaluate and compare the expressive ability of existing hypergraph kernels. We revisit classical kernels such as Hypergraph Weisfeiler-Lehman (HG WL) and Hypergraph Rooted kernels, providing theoretical conditions under which they fail to distinguish non-isomorphic hypergraphs. Motivated by these insights, we introduce the Hypergraph Subtree-Cycle Kernel, which augments subtree-based features with cycle-based structural patterns to enhance expressiveness. We propose two variants: HG SCKernelv1 and HG SCKernelv2. Extensive experiments on five graph and ten hypergraph classification benchmarks demonstrate the superior performance of our methods, confirming the effectiveness of integrating homomorphism-guided design into hypergraph kernels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: