Observational analysis assessed student wellbeing in 1548 adolescents across 35 schools, highlighting school climate and connectedness.
Abstract School characteristics are associated with student mental health cross-sectionally, but little is known about effects of school factors over time. This study assessed whether school-level (regional, administrative, and student characteristics), staff-level (school culture and promotion of wellbeing), and student-level factors (school climate and connectedness) were associated with students’ distress and wellbeing cross-sectionally, and two years later. The sample consisted of N = 1548 adolescents in Year 8 (Mage=13.9) from 35 schools in Australia. Results showed that greater student-level socioeconomic advantage was associated with better wellbeing cross-sectionally. Higher levels of student-rated school connectedness and climate were associated with greater wellbeing and lower distress cross-sectionally. Longitudinally, only higher student-rated school connectedness was associated with higher wellbeing two years later. No school-level factors were associated with student wellbeing or distress, cross-sectionally or two years later. Findings highlight the importance of students’ sense of connectedness with their school community on wellbeing over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stevens et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: