Observational analysis reveals distinct coparenting profiles in families, indicating that quality impacts child adjustment and marital satisfaction.
Coparenting relationships play an important role in shaping marital satisfaction, parenting behavior, and children's social-emotional adjustment. Coparenting relationship quality can be measured via parent self-report and direct observation. Each method has its strengths and weaknesses, providing different perspectives on coparenting relationships. However, most studies rely on one method-typically mother report-to assess coparenting quality, yielding an incomplete picture of coparenting dynamics. The present study obtained maternal reports, paternal reports, and observations of coparenting relationships in 160 dual-earner different-sex parent families (86% White, 88% married) with infants. Latent profile analysis was conducted to identify patterns in coparenting relationships and their associations with child and family functioning. Four distinct coparenting relationship profiles were identified: high-convergent (42%), high-reported, moderate-observed (34%), moderate-high-reported, mother less positive, low-observed (13%), and moderate-reported, father less positive, moderate-high observed (11%). Profile membership was associated with parents' marital satisfaction, positive parental engagement, and children's social-emotional adjustment. Overall, families in the high-convergent profile had the best family and child outcomes. Even though parents in the high-reported, moderate-observed profile perceived their coparenting relationships just as positively, these families experienced greater risk for compromised family functioning and child adjustment compared to families in the high-convergent profile. Obtaining observations and fathers' reports of coparenting in addition to mothers' reports appears desirable to understand the roles of coparenting in family functioning, particularly in children's social-emotional adjustment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: