September 12, 2025Policing An International Journal

The “Section 60 stop and search super-complaint” and what it reveals about evidence-based policing and the super-complaints system

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Findings reveal significant methodological weaknesses in the report on the super-complaint regarding section 60 stop and search practices, highlighting gaps in evidence-based policing.
The analysis demonstrates how the report understated forces' failures in applying principles of evidence-based policing to stop and search, undermining accountability.
This paper employs a close reading of the joint report produced by oversight bodies investigating the super-complaint, examining its methodologies.
Implications suggest that weaknesses in the report restricted the potential for more radical reforms in the application of evidence-based policing.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Investigation reveals methodological weaknesses in policing report on super-complaint for stop and search, indicating selective emphasis on evidence-based policing.

Cite This Study

Clare Torrible (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d44a4731b076d99fa53ee3 https://doi.org/10.1108/pijpsm-09-2024-0148

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Investigation reveals methodological weaknesses in policing report on super-complaint for stop and search, indicating selective emphasis on evidence-based policing.

The “Section 60 stop and search super-complaint” and what it reveals about evidence-based policing and the super-complaints system

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

The “Section 60 stop and search super-complaint” and what it reveals about evidence-based policing and the super-complaints system

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider