Randomized, placebo-controlled trial assessed safety and efficacy of Nd:YAG laser, showing similar outcomes in melasma treatment.
BACKGROUND Despite evidence supporting efficacy of low-fluence Q-switched (QS) neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) 1,064-nm lasers, treatment protocols are not standardized and limited to mostly retrospective, observational, or inadequately controlled studies. OBJECTIVE To investigate the safety and efficacy of low-fluence QS Nd:YAG (1,064 nm) laser in the treatment of melasma. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective, blind, randomized, placebo-controlled split face trial was conducted. Patients with Fitzpatrick skin types I-IV, and melasma severity scores of at least 2 received 3 monthly treatments using mechanical exfoliation, low-fluence QS Nd:YAG laser, hydroquinone 4% twice daily, and sunscreen. RESULTS Both treatment and control sides of the face showed a comparable decrease in melanin index (MI), with a statistically significant difference only after treatment 2 ( p = .04). The Modified Melasma and Severity Index (mMASI) score for both the treatment and control decreased but without any significant difference (.18 < p < .57). The highest level of patient-reported improvement occurred at week 8; however, patient-reported improvement decreased by the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION Placebo and laser treatment groups showed an effective, safe, yet similar decrease in both MI and mMASI scores, indicating that low-fluence, QS Nd:YAG laser treatments did not add significant benefit beyond combination topical therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sadeghpour et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: