This article examines accountability of non-state actors in armed conflicts, focusing on Boko Haram's implications under international laws and policies.
This article scrutinises the legal frameworks governing the accountability of non-stateactors in non-international armed conflicts, with a specific focus on the Nigerian BokoHaram insurgency. It examines international laws pertaining to armed conflicts andcounter-terrorism measures to assess the mechanisms available for addressing thechallenges posed by such conflicts. Through a case study of the Boko Haram insurgency,the article explores the intricacies of holding non-state actors accountable within theNigerian context, evaluating the efficacy of existing legal frameworks and policyresponses. By synthesising theoretical perspectives with empirical evidence, the articleaims to deepen understanding of non-state actor regulation in armed conflicts andinform strategies for enhancing legal and policy responses to similar disputes globally.With a detailed analysis of the Boko Haram insurgency, including its actors, tactics, andpolicy responses, this article seeks to identify avenues for improving non-state actors'adherence to the laws of war by pinpointing gaps in applicable laws, implementation,and enforcement mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sam Omotoso (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: