Cost-effectiveness analysis reveals medication monitors improve adherence among tuberculosis patients, suggesting a differentiated care approach is viable.
Abstract Background Digital Adherence Technologies (DATs) are being investigated for use in many countries. Within the TB MATE pragmatic cluster-randomised trial, we evaluated the effectiveness (already published) and hereby present the cost-effectiveness of using a medication monitor (Wisepill evriMED 1000 device) to inform a Differentiated Care Approach (DCA) involving text messages, phone calls and home visits in three provinces of South Africa. Methods We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis from a societal perspective at six clinics, one intervention and one standard of care (SoC) clinic per province (June 2019-August 2020). Health system costs were collected using a bottom-up activity-based costing approach involving time and motion studies. People with Tuberculosis (PWTB) were interviewed on costs related to accessing the intervention. The primary efficacy outcome used in the trial was ≥ 80% adherence, measured using medication monitor opening as a proxy for adherence. Unit costs were calculated as cost per patient treated for TB while incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated as cost per additional adherent PWTB. Results From a total of 2757 enrolled (62% male, median age 36 years IQR (27–45 years), adherence data was available for 1278 PWTB in the intervention arm and 1306 PWTB in the SoC arm, where effectiveness was 81% and 50.8% in the intervention and SoC arms respectively. The total cost per patient treated for TB was $103.93-$199.87 (intervention) and $44.89 - $131.22 (SoC), resulting in a societal incremental cost of $49.73 (mean). Patient costs were $38.98 - $117.94 (intervention) and $35.92-$91.94 (SoC) per patient with indirect costs (foregone income) contributing to a large proportion of total costs at three intervention (56.7% − 69.8%) and two SoC (69% and 77.4%) clinics. The ICER of achieving an additional adherent PWTB was $166.33. Conclusion Medication monitors and DCA can be considered a cost-effective option for investment and scale-up if we reduce health systems costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mukora et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: