Cross-sectional study finds higher asthma and bronchitis in non-green areas, suggesting urban greening can improve health outcomes.
Abstract Background: Air pollution has become a significant adverse contributor to health issues, especially in cities in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Bangladesh. Urban green spaces have emerged as potential buffers against particulate matter pollution-related health risks. This study investigates the impact of particulate matter on the physical and mental health of residents from green and non-green spaces. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 384 participants (18–35 years), equally divided between green and non-green urban areas. PM values were collected using the NAX tool over seven days. Health outcomes were collected using DASS 10 and structured questionnaires. Spatial analysis was conducted using ArcGIS; statistical analysis involved logistic and ordinal regression. Results: Non-green areas exhibited significantly higher PM₂.₅ and PM₁₀ concentrations. Residents in these areas showed elevated rates of asthma, bronchitis, allergic rhinitis, skin disorders, and mental health symptoms. Bronchitis (OR=254.6) and asthma (OR=36.3) showed the strongest associations(p<0.001) with non-green residency. NDVI was inversely correlated with PM levels. Conclusion: Urban greening is a critical environmental health intervention. Expanding green infrastructure may reduce pollutant exposure and improve overall physical and mental health outcomes in urban LMIC settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tabassom et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: