Qualitative study explores how teaching methodologies enhance cognitive skills and reduce psychological barriers in students.
Mathematics, as a discipline of abstraction, requires learners to move beyond concrete experiences and engage with symbolic, logical, and structural reasoning. However, many students encounter cognitive and psychological barriers when transitioning to abstract mathematical thought. This qualitative study explores teaching methodologies that influence learners’ ability to grasp abstract mathematical concepts while addressing cognitive readiness and psychological factors such as anxiety, motivation, and self-efficacy. Using a document-based qualitative approach, the research synthesizes insights from constructivist theory, scaffolding, inquiry-based learning, and the use of manipulative. Thematic analysis reveals that teaching methodologies play a dual role: they serve as cognitive scaffolds to bridge the gap between concrete and abstract thinking and as psychological supports that reduce fear and enhance motivation. Findings indicate that constructivist, dialogical, and experiential approaches significantly enhance cognitive flexibility, while strategies that encourage reflection and collaboration alleviate psychological barriers. The study concludes that effective mathematics teaching requires a holistic approach that simultaneously nurtures cognitive and emotional dimensions of learning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fancy Mukherjee (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: