Observational study shows the utility of multiple techniques for diagnosing congenital anomalies, suggesting improved genetic counseling.
Introduction: Etiological diagnosis of congenital anomalies greatly influences further reproductive genetic counseling. We herein report our experience of using various modalities for identification of the same. Materials and Methods: Pregnancies undergoing elective termination due to fetal congenital anomaly(ies) detected on antenatal ultrasonography were enrolled. Fetal autopsy, radiological studies and histopathology were done in all cases. Chromosomal Microarray (CMA) and Exome sequencing (ES) was done in selected cases. Results: One hundred seventy-four fetuses were enrolled. In 19.4% of cases a change in diagnosis/recurrence risk was observed based on a finding in autopsy. Utility of radiology and histopathology was observed in 5.7% and 13.4% of a selected subgroup of the cohort respectively. 39 cases (22%) were taken up for genetic testing. In this selected cohort overall positivity rate of genetic testing was 43.5% (28% and 71% for CMA and ES respectively). Conclusion: A phenotype-driven and systematic approach has the highest yield in detecting causes of fetal congenital anomalies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniel et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: