Retrospective analysis reveals higher progression risks for cervical low-grade lesions with ASC-H, indicating targeted management is essential.
Background: Treatment protocol for patients with cervical histologic low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) such as that preceded by serious cytology and repeated diagnosis for at least 2 years is unclear. Objective: This study investigates the follow-up results of patients with cervical histologic LSIL and aims to provide evidence support for treatment and follow-up strategy. Design: A retrospective observational study design was used. Methods: The retrospective study included 4263 patients with cervical histologic LSIL diagnosed between August 2014 and February 2021. The follow-up period ended in August 2023. Results: During the followed-up of 6–101 months, 3246 (76.1%), 628 (14.7%), and 389 (9.1%) of the 4263 patients had lesion regression, persistence, and progression. Multiple gravidities, high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) positive, HPV 16 positive, and cytologic examination (⩾atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H)) were independent risk factors for histologic LSIL progression. The annual cumulative cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)3+ rate of patients with histologic LSIL preceded by cytologic ASC-H and gravidity >2 was 6.3% (1-year), 22.4% (2-year), 28.2% (3-year), 28.2% (4-year), and 28.2% (5-year). The cumulative CIN2+ and CIN3+ rates in patients with histologic LSIL under risk factors and repeated diagnosis for at least 2 years were significantly higher than patients preceded by cytologic negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, and LSIL. Conclusion: Cervical histologic LSIL had a high natural regression rate and a low progression rate. Multiple gravidities, high-risk HPV positivity, HPV 16 positivity, and cytological examination ⩾ASC-H were risk factors for histologic LSIL progression. For patients with histologic LSIL preceded by cytologic ASC-H, stratified management based on the number of gravidities might be an option.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: