Multi-site analysis reveals distinct growth responses in Scots pine, Norway spruce, and black alder, suggesting implications for forest management.
In the context of intensifying climate change, dendroclimatic research provides insight into tree responses to environmental variability. This study assessed relationships between temperature, precipitation, and radial growth of four major forest species in Central Europe: Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.), Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) H. Karst), pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.), and black alder (Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.). Analyses were conducted at three independent sites to account for local variability and enhance robustness. We tested three hypotheses: (1) replication improves reliability in dendrochronological studies, (2) multi-species analysis strengthens interpretation of climate–growth relationships, and (3) black alder exhibits distinct precipitation sensitivity. Results showed species- and site-specific responses. The first hypothesis was supported, as replication enhanced the robustness of climate–growth signals in Scots pine, Norway spruce, and pedunculate oak showed broadly consistent responses, while black alder maintained its distinct pattern. Scots pine responded strongly to summer rainfall (June–August, including July of the previous year), Norway spruce to summer rainfall (June–July of the current and previous year), and pedunculate oak to summer rainfall (June–July, with additional effects in August). Black alder exhibited positive correlations with winter precipitation (December–January of the previous year) and negative with summer rainfall (May, June, August; September–November of the previous year), suggesting moisture-related stress. Temperature sensitivity occurred in winter and early spring (December–April, especially February–March) for most species, except black alder, which also responded positively to summer temperatures (May, July–September). These findings highlight the importance of species traits and site conditions in dendroclimatic studies and support replicated multi-species approaches to guide adaptive forest management under climate change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tokarska-Osyczka et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: