Empirical validation reveals significant changes in professional and civic qualities from project-based learning, suggesting enhanced student agency.
This article presents the results of an empirical validation of a methodology for measuring students’ selfassessment of professionalism and civic-mindedness at Ural Federal University as outcomes of project-based learning. The relevance of the study lies in the existing gap in research from the perspective of developing agency — that is, the capacity for conscious transformation of oneself and one’s environment — which is critical for realizing the university’s third mission. The aim of the study is to experimentally validate a self-diagnostic toolkit for assessing levels of professionalism and civic responsibility as criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of project-based learning. The novelty of the methodology lies in its incorporation of a skills set that includes both universal professional competencies and civic qualities, the use of student self-reflection tools, and the capacity for quantitative assessment of developmental dynamics. To test the methodology, two panel measurements of self-assessed professional and civic qualities were conducted among 175 students in social and economic disciplines — before and after completing a project. The methodology demonstrated high diagnostic value, revealing statistically significant changes in key indicators after just one semester of project work. A dynamic correlation was found between the initial level of civic-mindedness, the perception of project-based learning, and the subsequent self-assessment of professional qualities. Implementing regular monitoring using this self-diagnostic methodology can support evidence-based management decisions regarding project-based learning at universities, based on the dynamics of students’ self-assessed professionalism and civic responsibility, taking into account the parameters of project design and implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tarasova et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: